No-Arbitrage Is Weaker Than Completeness
Why can a market be arbitrage-free and still leave some claims without a unique price?
打开 →GLOBAL SEARCH
搜索在服务端完成,题目解析与答案不会进入搜索结果。登录后可搜索自己的收藏题单。
找到 28 个结果
中文题目Why can a market be arbitrage-free and still leave some claims without a unique price?
打开 →In a one-period binomial model, S0=100, Su=120, Sd=90, and the simple risk-free rate is 0. Compute the risk-neutral probability of the up state, and state whether the no-arbitrage condition holds.
打开 →In a one-period binomial model, S0=50, Su=65, Sd=45, and the simple risk-free rate is 0.05. Compute the risk-neutral probability of the up state, and state whether the no-arbitrage condition holds.
打开 →A one-period stock has S0=100, future states 118, 94, and 76, and risk-free rate 0. Use the discounted-price convex-hull test to decide whether an arbitrage-free pricing measure can exist.
打开 →A one-period stock has S0=80, future states 86, 82, and 70, and risk-free rate 0.02. Use the discounted-price convex-hull test to decide whether an arbitrage-free pricing measure can exist.
打开 →A call with strike 80 trades at 25. Ignoring discounting and using only no-arbitrage monotonicity and slope bounds across strikes, what admissible price interval does that imply for the call with higher strike 90?
打开 →A call with strike 100 trades at 10.5. Ignoring discounting and using only no-arbitrage monotonicity and slope bounds across strikes, what admissible price interval does that imply for the call with higher strike 110?
打开 →At the same maturity, calls are quoted as C(95)=7 and C(105)=5.8 with 105>95. Does this satisfy basic no-arbitrage monotonicity across strikes?
打开 →At the same maturity, calls are quoted as C(100)=6.2 and C(110)=6.4 with 110>100. Does this satisfy basic no-arbitrage monotonicity across strikes?
打开 →At the same maturity, calls are quoted as C(85)=7.8 and C(100)=5 with 100>85. Does this satisfy basic no-arbitrage monotonicity across strikes?
打开 →Calls with strikes 90 and 120 trade at 18 and 6. What no-arbitrage interval can you infer for the missing call price C(105) using static sub- and super-replication only?
打开 →For a non-dividend-paying stock with spot 100, strike 95, annual rate 0.05, and maturity T=1, what are the basic no-arbitrage lower and upper bounds for a European call?
打开 →For a non-dividend-paying stock with spot 90, strike 100, annual rate 0.04, and maturity T=0.5, what are the basic no-arbitrage lower and upper bounds for a European call?
打开 →For spot 100, strike 95, annual rate 0.05, and maturity T=1, what are the basic no-arbitrage lower and upper bounds for a European put?
打开 →For spot 90, strike 100, annual rate 0.04, and maturity T=0.5, what are the basic no-arbitrage lower and upper bounds for a European put?
打开 →A non-dividend-paying asset has spot price 100. If the annual funding rate is 0.04 and maturity is 1 years, what is the no-arbitrage forward price under annual compounding?
打开 →A non-dividend-paying asset has spot price 85. If the annual funding rate is 0.03 and maturity is 0.5 years, what is the no-arbitrage forward price under annual compounding?
打开 →Why does a unique no-arbitrage price disappear as soon as the trinomial market has more states than traded securities?
打开 →Why can a minimum-variance hedge still fail to pin down a unique no-arbitrage price?
打开 →Why do indifference prices depend on risk aversion while no-arbitrage intervals do not?
打开 →At one maturity bucket, the desk estimates the endpoint instantaneous forward volatility sigma(t,T)=0.015 and the HJM no-arbitrage drift alpha(t,T)=0.027. In the one-factor relation alpha(t,T)=sigma(t,T)*integral_t^T sigma(t,u) du, what value is implied for integral_t^T sigma(t,u
打开 →A one-period stock is 100 today and ends at 120, 100, or 80. The risk-free rate is 0. A quoted up-state digital that pays 1 only in the up state trades at 0.2, which completes the market. What unique no-arbitrage price does this imply for the claim paying 5, 1, and 0 in the up, m
打开 →Calls with strikes 95 and 105>95 are priced at 4.8 and 1.6. With annual rate 0.05 and maturity T=1, is the bull call spread price C(K1)-C(K2) inside its no-arbitrage bounds? Also report the bound interval.
打开 →Calls with strikes 100 and 110>100 are priced at 5.4 and 2.1. With annual rate 0.04 and maturity T=0.5, is the bull call spread price C(K1)-C(K2) inside its no-arbitrage bounds? Also report the bound interval.
打开 →Calls with strikes 80 and 90>80 are priced at 4 and 1.3. With annual rate 0.03 and maturity T=1.5, is the bull call spread price C(K1)-C(K2) inside its no-arbitrage bounds? Also report the bound interval.
打开 →Calls with strikes 110 and 120>110 are priced at 3.5 and 1. With annual rate 0.02 and maturity T=1, is the bull call spread price C(K1)-C(K2) inside its no-arbitrage bounds? Also report the bound interval.
打开 →Why are no-arbitrage bounds still useful even when you do not have a perfect parity identity available?
打开 →If CIP is a no-arbitrage relation, why can markets still exhibit a persistent cross-currency basis?
打开 →