95% Half-Width From Sample Volatility and Path Count 21
A Monte Carlo estimator has sample standard deviation 5 across n=400 paths. Using the normal approximation, what is the 95% half-width?
打开 →GLOBAL SEARCH
搜索在服务端完成,题目解析与答案不会进入搜索结果。登录后可搜索自己的收藏题单。
找到 30 个结果
中文题目A Monte Carlo estimator has sample standard deviation 5 across n=400 paths. Using the normal approximation, what is the 95% half-width?
打开 →A simulated path for an arithmetic-average Asian call is [95, 92, 90, 97] with strike 94. What payoff does this single path contribute to the Monte Carlo estimator?
打开 →A Monte Carlo estimate is 12.0 with standard error 0.4. Using the normal approximation, what 95% confidence interval do you report?
打开 →A payoff is averaged with its antithetic partner. The variance of the antithetic average is 30% of the crude single-path variance, and the two legs have equal variance. What correlation rho is implied between the paired payoffs?
打开 →A Monte Carlo desk averages each payoff with its antithetic partner. The variance of the antithetic average is observed to be 35% of the crude single-path variance. If the paired payoffs have equal variance, what correlation rho between the two payoffs is implied?
打开 →A control variate Y has Var(Y)=16. The desk estimates the optimal coefficient b*=0.75 in X-b(Y-E[Y]). What Cov(X,Y) is implied?
打开 →A control variate Y has sample variance Var(Y)=25. The optimal control coefficient is estimated as b*=0.8 in the estimator X - b*(Y-E[Y]). What Cov(X,Y) is implied?
打开 →A control variate Y has sample variance Var(Y)=4. The desk estimates the optimal coefficient b*=1.5 in X - b*(Y-E[Y]). What Cov(X,Y) is implied?
打开 →A control variate Y has sample variance Var(Y)=9. The estimated optimal control coefficient is b*=-0.6. What Cov(X,Y) is implied?
打开 →A raw Monte Carlo estimator has sample mean Xbar=12. The control sample mean is Ybar=103, the desk uses b*=0.5, and the adjusted estimate Xbar - b*(Ybar-mu_Y) equals 10.5. What known control mean mu_Y is implied?
打开 →A payoff has regime probabilities 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2. The conditional means are 1, m, and -2, and the overall expected payoff is 0.7. What is m?
打开 →A payoff has conditional mean 5 in a calm regime and unknown mean m in a stress regime. The calm regime probability is 0.6 and the overall expected payoff is 2.6. What is m?
打开 →In regime A, which occurs with probability 0.4, an option pays 10 if exercised. In regime B, which occurs with probability 0.6, it pays 4 if exercised, and the regime-B exercise probability is 0.25. The overall expected payoff is 2.6. What exercise probability in regime A is impl
打开 →A payoff has conditional mean 5 in a calm regime and -2 in a stress regime. The unconditional mean is 2.2. What calm-regime probability is implied?
打开 →A payoff has conditional mean 4 in a calm regime and -3 in a stress regime. The overall expected payoff is 1.9. What probability of the calm regime is implied?
打开 →Two strata have population weights N1=0.6 and N2=0.4. Their standard deviations are sigma1=2 and sigma2=unknown. Under equal-cost Neyman allocation, the desk wants stratum 2 to receive 50% of the samples. What sigma2 is implied?
打开 →A payoff has conditional mean 2 in a normal regime and -4 in a stress regime. The overall expected payoff is 0.8. What probability of the stress regime is implied?
打开 →A raw Monte Carlo estimator has sample mean Xbar=9. The control sample mean is Ybar=41, the desk uses b*=0.5, and the adjusted estimate Xbar-b(Ybar-mu_Y) equals 8. What known control mean mu_Y is implied?
打开 →Two strata have population weights N1=0.7 and N2=0.3. Under equal-cost Neyman allocation they end up with equal sample shares. What ratio sigma2/sigma1 is implied?
打开 →Why does the smile effect of jumps often decay with maturity more differently than the smile effect of plain stochastic volatility?
打开 →Why is exact jump simulation straightforward once the jump count is sampled?
打开 →Why can Monte Carlo variance explode for tail-heavy payoffs under jump-diffusion even if vanilla prices are stable?
打开 →Why do positive and negative jumps change the volatility smile in different ways even if jump variance is the same?
打开 →Why can a jump-risk model still be useful even if it does not fit every strike perfectly?
打开 →What two pieces make up Var(X) under the law of total variance when a simulator first samples a regime Z and then samples X conditional on Z?
打开 →Why is drift freezing popular even when everyone knows it is an approximation?
打开 →Where does drift freezing usually break down first?
打开 →Why are Bermudan rates options materially harder than caplets in an LMM?
打开 →Why is the terminal measure convenient for simulation even though product pricing may later be expressed under another measure?
打开 →Why do market models often align better with desk quotations than generic state-variable models?
打开 →